For my gallery visit this week I chose to go to the Burchfield Penney art museum, as it is right on the Buff State campus and it is free. After looking around, only one exhibit seemed to be cohesive enough to do a gallery study on it - the "An Overabundance of Detail" gallery, specifically the Sylvia L. Rosen side of the gallery. The theme of the gallery was posted right on the wall. It was inspired by artist Carolyn Panzica and her intricate work with sugar. Specifically, it was "an exploration of how the essential details of an object inform, create tension, and ultimately balance with the whole."
In terms of the physical gallery space, it was a white, semi-circular room. It was separated by a 3/4 wall in the middle that stretched about half way into the room. It was lit by small overhead lights and had a few skylights (which were actually covered) with more lights in them. Most of the gallery was simply drywall, white paint, wooden floors, wooden podiums, and plexiglass display cases. The entire space seemed very sterile which made the intricacies of the detailed artworks all the more apparent. The movement of the viewer was in the shape of the room, a semi-circle. You could view all the podium pieces from all sides.
The artwork was not organized in any special way - besides them all being roughly 8-10 feet away from one another, there was not one area dedicated to a specific artist. In terms of similarities, many artists were repeated (Katharine Sehr, Carolyn Panzica, Felice Koenig, etc.), various mediums were revisited throughout the gallery (acrylic, sugar, etc.), and almost all the pieces were extremely intricate and detailed. Surprisingly, a large number of them were "Untitled" as well. There were many different mediums throughout the room - the most interesting was sugar but there was also clay, ink, paper, and various metals. Furthermore, none of the works of art in my gallery were framed and only a few were in plexiglass displays. They were all identified by an information card next to the work.
The three pieces I chose are as follows:
1.) Katharine Sehr,
Untitled, 2009, ink on paper, roughly 12' x 4'
I think this piece was non-representational and was just a demonstration of the intricacies of pen and ink. It also doesn't make use of modified images. Overall, it is a long ink on paper work of art with teal, grey, black, and orange rectangles. The boxes are made up of small ink lines, almost scribbles.
Principles - This piece uses the principle of line heavily, as many tiny intricate lines make up the majority of the piece. Color is also important, as the various lines are done in different colors in different intervals throughout the piece.
Elements - This piece uses rhythm, as the same technique is used throughout the entire piece. It also uses proportion, as the colored boxes are done in different sizes
This piece doesn't necessarily remind me of anything. If it were done in a different medium, it might look like a flag or a rug. It does bear a resemblance to Sol DeWitt's wall drawings, as it looks like tiny scribbles.
I didn't have a strong emotional reaction to this piece, but I did find it soothing for some reason despite the "busy-ness" of the piece. I don't think Sehr was trying to make a point other than pen and ink can be used to make very intricate pieces.
2.) Carolyn Panzica,
Untitled, 2011, Sugar string on a sugar base, roughly 1' x .75'
I learned from the wall that Panzica works almost exclusively with sugar and that the purpose of this gallery was to take influence from her intricate work with cakes. I think this picture is representational of a pond or the sea, and is a modified picture of a fish. The piece uses many greens and blues, and features a large blue koi fish with red fins and an orange head.
Elements- This piece uses form, as it is three dimensional. It also uses color because it repeats a lot of blues and greens throughout the piece to represent underwater life. It is also highly textured, as it is made out of sugar
Principles- Rhythm is represented in this piece as many of the textures are repeated heavily. Furthermore, the "xxx" pattern makes up the scales of the fish, showing harmony and unity.
This piece is pretty straightforward - it is a fish in a pond. There is a strange perspective on the piece - the fish makes it look like it is a view from the above, but the grass makes it look like it is a view from the side. This piece actually reminds me of
The Great Wave.
This piece looks delicious! But in all seriousness, I enjoyed the simplicity of this piece within the detailed-nature of the medium. It reminded me of "Realism," where artists found every day things to be sufficient subjects for their works of art.
3.) John Tracey,
Untitled, 2007, clay, oil paint, and graphite, roughly 3x2x.5'
This piece is again representational of sea life. It is a series of shells, starfish, and coral, all painted jet black. It is a modified image of sea life as it seems like something that wouldn't actually occur in nature. This piece is interesting as the artist could have painted it quite vibrantly - instead, he chose to paint it entirely black.
Elements- This piece uses form as it is three dimensional. It also uses color since the entire piece is black. Furthermore, it is very textured and spikey.
Principles- This piece uses unity, as the combination of sea life together makes the piece a whole.
This piece is very reminiscent of an ocean or some sort of sea life. It is also quite depressing, as black in nature is usually a representation of death or pollution. From far away, it looked as if this piece were made of tires or black rubber.
The way I interpreted this piece was that it was a criticism of our polluted oceans. The black was a fairly good indicator that the piece wasn't supposed to be representative of vibrant, sea life.